Skip to Main Content
let me hear your voice tonight (
alexseanchai
) wrote
2013
-
01
-
23
03:55 pm
(no subject)
No more ban keeping US female soldiers from serving in combat roles.
Yay equality!
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
lliira
2013-01-23 09:53 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
Awesome!
And I wish I still lived in Michigan so I could keep voting for Carl Levin.
Edited
2013-01-23 21:54 (UTC)
no subject
grimsqueaker
2013-01-23 10:19 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
No, no, this is a bad thing.
The equality should have been extended in the opposite direction, to ban ALL US troops from serving in combat roles.
...Is that not the proper liberal, pacifist response? Because it IS my honest response.
no subject
alexseanchai
2013-01-24 05:40 am (UTC)
(
link
)
No US standing army would be a marvelous thing, I agree. Since it's here and there's probably no getting rid of it, it needs to be equal-opportunity.
no subject
sylvaine
2013-01-24 08:39 am (UTC)
(
link
)
... They weren't allowed to do that before?! Oh humanity, why are you how you are. (though I am pleased that's finally changed!)
no subject
pauamma
2013-01-24 07:31 pm (UTC)
(
link
)
What I find most interesting in that video is the CJCS twiddling his thumbs, squirming, and occasionally casting side looks at whatever the SECDEF is reading from.
5 comments
Post a new comment
Flat
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Log in
Account name:
Password:
Remember me
Other options:
Forget your password?
Log in with OpenID?
Close
menu
Log in
Create
Create Account
Display Preferences
Explore
Interests
Directory Search
Site and Journal Search
Latest Things
Random Journal
Random Community
FAQ
Shop
Buy Dreamwidth Services
Gift a Random User
DW Merchandise
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Otomatik - 34.225.3.25
CloudFlare DNS
Türk Telekom DNS
Google DNS
Open DNS
OSZAR »
no subject
And I wish I still lived in Michigan so I could keep voting for Carl Levin.
no subject
The equality should have been extended in the opposite direction, to ban ALL US troops from serving in combat roles.
...Is that not the proper liberal, pacifist response? Because it IS my honest response.
no subject
no subject
no subject