let me hear your voice tonight (
alexseanchai) wrote2015-09-13 04:48 pm
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
(no subject)
Some days I really wish learning the meanings of and differences between kinks, squicks, and triggers, and when to label content for which, was a mandatory part of high school.
...anti-trigger-warning people on Facebook, you see. Virulently so. Viciously so. I respect "choose not to warn", but at least that warning tag respects the concept of warnings and is not masquerading as "no warnings apply"!
...anti-trigger-warning people on Facebook, you see. Virulently so. Viciously so. I respect "choose not to warn", but at least that warning tag respects the concept of warnings and is not masquerading as "no warnings apply"!
no subject
no subject
Yes. And heaven forbid that anyone be more fragile than the speakers themselves (those who have survived the things that pro-warning people generally agree should be warned for, anyway). Such fragile people need to be condemned to a life of low-pay, low-status jobs because they're not cut out for college because they wish to have trigger warnings on material that will remind them of their traumas. And not coddled, absolutely not coddled, which is what providing the warnings would be. When providing the warnings isn't flat out censorship, anyway.
I hate this argument and I don't know how I keep getting myself stuck in the middle of it.
no subject
no subject
political correctnesstreating people with respect...ye gods I wish everyone knew that reference
no subject
*sigh*